Monday, August 30, 2010

Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life, By: Danah Boyd.

Hey Everyone!!

Jess and I are presenting Danah Boyd's article this week. It is about how online sites like MySpace and Facebook became common destinations for young people/ teens in the United States. I'm sure we are all aware of these sites and after reading the article some of us can probably relate to what these teen went through, as they continue to be an important part of teen social life. I am going to concentrate on the theme of identity, and how teens in the United states shape or hide their identities, and how their identities may be influenced by their online audience, and therefore changed to impress their online participants.

The very first quote of the reading indicates a loss of identity. "If you are not on MySpace, you don't exist". This was said by Skyler, who is 18 and explaining this to her mom. Therefore, it is obviously a combination of peer pressure from school, the interest in online sites, and the pleasure of being able to maybe have another identity that attracts these teens to the sites. Basically Skyler is saying that if you are not on MySpace you are nothing. Skyler also posts things on her Xanga because she thinks if the kids at school read what she has to say and how she says it, they will want to be friends with her. It almost seems like being on MySpace is a way to prove yourself to your teen peers, a kind of initiation that is the "essential to being seen as cool as school". These sites could be seen as "insights to identity formation, status negotiation, and peer-to-peer sociality". Do you agree with this? Were your reasons for joining to feel cool and to fit in at school, or to form an acceptable identity, one which you could manipulate in order to gain acceptance from other kids? Did your joining any online sites have anything to do with your identity?

According to Boyd, "social network sites are providing teens with a space to work out identity and status, make sense of cultural cues, and negotiate public life". These sites are allowing "teenagers to experience social life online". Having a profile on a popular site will give teens the opportunity to be part of a popular online community through which they can craft a personal representation of themselves, and therefore create an identity, or change their identity to suit a norm. Do you think the ability to "visualise their social world through the networked collection of profiles", affects the way these teens want to present themselves, or be identified by other online friends and participants? How do you want to be identified, or seen by others on Facebook or any other online profile you have created? Does the visual aspect of being able to see other peoples' profiles and the fact that they can see yours make you want to present yourself differently, or alter your identity? Having the ability to look at others profiles also gives teens a sense of what types of presentations are socially appropriate. Other's profiles "provide critical cues about what to present on their own profile", and they can therefore "manipulate their profiles to express themselves". Do you find that you see things on someone else's profile and then you go back and change your own, or maybe remove something that has been written on your Facebook wall, just because you don't want people to see? Having the option of being able to remove things off our walls on Facebook might play into the fact that everyone wants to create an acceptable identity, or presentation of themselves that others will see.

Another way we may alter our identity is when we take note of how others have responded to our behaviour, because we can then "assess how well we have conveyed what we have intended", and we can then "alter our performance accordingly". This process of performance, interpretation and adjustment is what Erving Goffman calls impression management". I find this interesting because it is so true in everyday life and on online sites such as Facebook, we all seem to adjust our identities according to what knowledge we have gained from other people's presentations of what is appropriate. So then why do people join these sites if they can't be themselves and they are forever altering who they really are in order to perceived a certain way? Is it maybe because offline this is not as easy, and because online they can be selective with what information they share with others? This direct link between online and offline identities is precisely why teens are inclined to present the side of themselves that they believe will be well received by their peers.This all leads back to impressing one's audience, and one has to understand their audience in order to present one's self in the appropriate way.

MySpace, Facebook and other online sites are definitely, in my opinion, an escape for many young people. Due to the lack of mobility and the structural and social barriers that many teens experience, they see MySpace as an escape. The rapid rise in curfew legislation and the restriction on youths from drinking and socialising in many venues, makes the spaces they can hang out in very controlled and "under surveillance", and therefore they spend most of their time on the net creating profiles from which they can create and alter their identities and be friends with whoever they want. Parental control over youths "explains more than just complications in identity performance; it is the root of why teenagers are on MySpace in the first place". It is clear that when parents try and control teens behaviour in this new space, teens react by hiding away. Do you agree with this? Did your parents try and ban you form joining online sites? If they did, would you say you became devious and hid your identity or created a new secret identity just to stay on the site and so your parents wouldn't bother you about it ?



5 comments:

  1. Hey guys, Seemed like the discussion went well in class today- I think facebook is something most people can relate to, and as we discussed in class today, it is something that people are a part of even if they signed up unwillingly, or even if they didn't agree with it. Someone actually mentioned that they were a part of My Space and a facebook "hater" but when most people shifted over to facebook, so too did the facebook haters. I believe this to be because of the fear of not being included in day to day actions in the world, for example being invited places, or maybe even being unaware of what people are posting or putting photos of. This unawareness will distance those who are not a part of the facebook network even further, and this is the reason why many people have joined facebook. I do believe that facebook has positive aspects, including keeping in touch with friends and family from oversees, which was a reason many people in todays tutorial claimed to be why they are a part of the facebook community now, but we have to keep in the back of our mind that this creation has been the cause of so much private invasion.
    I felt that this presentation was done very well, and the questions asked were easily related to most of the class. Well done guys =)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey I really enjoyed this reading and the discussion in class like Tarryn because it was so easy to relate to. Although I find facebook very useful and convenient to stay in touch with people overseas and see what they are up to I feel like it has in a way replaced and distanced us from the traditional sense of being friends. Now most of us will have about 500 friends on facebook but when you think about it you probably only talk to about 100 of them and the rest are people we just know or as mentioned in class we feel bad to say no to. I'm sure we've also all had people adding us that we have never heard of and when we look at their profile it says you have mutual friends and I always think to myself "just because we have mutual friends does not mean we have to be friends!" if I haven't had a proper conversation with that person and i'm not ever going to make plans to see them why would I add them? Do you guys also feel that way or am I just being mean? I think the definition of "friends" on facebook is very very different to "friends" in real life, and we often forget about this and just add people we have only spoken to once or twice because it is the "polite" thing to do.

    But by doing this I feel we are moving away from the personal aspect of things because we are not physically talking to our friends anymore rather we are just sending a msg or a post to update people on our situation and in this way we are displaying our life to a whole community of people, people we would probably not share that information with in person e.g. breaking up with your partner, or writing something personal on someones wall, and its happened to me before where someone I did not know very well came up to me and made a comment about a picture they saw of me and was like hahhahaa i was just facebook stalking you! That aspect of people being able to openly view your profile and being able to "stalk" you is a bit scary and since then I have definitely put my privacy settings to the highest.

    And as Tarryn also mentioned we are in a way allowing people to invade our private life, maybe facebook is a new type of JenniCAM, most people constantly upload new pictures of themselves and edit their status daily this could be seem as an encouragement for voyeurism.

    Anyways these are just my thoughts, hope they are a bit coherent Xxx

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Nadine,

    You are in no way being mean! You definitely need to be comfortable with who you're allowing into your virtual network, especially if you are particularly active. I know I have pretty strict criteria for accepting friends. I have to have at least enjoyed their company on more than one occasion; being at the same school as me for 12 years in no way guarantees acceptance!

    And I think the whole FB stalking thing brings up an interesting social etiquette issue. Have you ever had the experience where you have organised plans with certain friends, and another friend assumes that because they can see the plan, they are a part of it, even if none of the posts are on their wall or mention them? When I was on exchange, there was one girl who used to invite herself along, and it was really awkward for the rest of us, because you can't really say no in that situation. The fact that she could see the plans meant that what we were doing was 'public' knowledge, but at the same time, we all assumed that no one would expect to be invited without an invite. Does that make sense? DO you think that with sites like FB and MySpace etc blurring the lines between 'public' and 'private', that we need to devise a new social etiquette? Can you see a future where along with 'don't interrupt when people are speaking', parents will teach their children the equivalent online etiquette? Now that's a weird thought.... Do you think it would be our generation as parents leading the charge?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey guys,

    I thought the presentation this week was very interesting and thought provoking. I agree with the idea of accepting people as "friends" and how it may be socially awkward to deny them. This being so, how can we deny this access to parents, family and colleagues? The identity we project offline is in some ways very different than online. Offline we develop multiple identities depending on the social circumstances. I know that I relate differently with my boss than I do with family. Conversations between parents are very different to that of friends. Online however, I am limited to projecting myself in one way- primarily the person I am around friends. What people share with family members is edited. For instance I will share information on an evening out with my Mum, but it won't contain all the details of the night's events. However, online my friends and I may discuss in detail the events as they unfolded. Would problems arise if parents had access to these unedited versions? Should family members and colleagues have unlimited access to our online life? Or, should they respect our need to retain some form of privacy and control in this public arena? It can be hard to argue that Facebook should remain private, when access to profiles is so freely given. However, everybody needs to feel a part of themselves is being kept private, even if there is nothing controversial to hide. It is not about hiding or evasiveness, it is about keeping a part of ourselves, for ourselves. The whole idea of keeping your privacy in a public setting still sounds contradictory to me. However, the term privacy may merely mean keeping my work, home and social life seperate.

    Look forward to seeing you 10amer's next week!

    ReplyDelete